Released: June 25th 1982
Length: 117 Minutes
Certificate: 18
Director: Ridley Scott
Starring: Harrison Ford, Sean Young, Rutger Hauer, Edward James Olmos, M. Emmet Walsh, Daryl Hannah, William Sanderson and Joe Turkel
Science fiction is territory ripe for exploring vibrant,
thought-provoking stories; some take us off-world while others take a more
grounded approach, homing in more on the human species and where we may be
heading. Coming off the 1979 classic Alien, Ridley Scott would continue his
ground-breaking work in science fiction with Blade Runner, a masterful showcase
of how imaginative and absorbing the genre can be.
Drawing its inspiration from the Phillip K. Dick story: “Do
Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” Blade Runner takes place in a futuristic Los
Angeles consumed by industrialisation and ruled by corporations. The advent of
biological android invention (known in this universe as replicants) led by the
Tyrell Corporation has threatened to shift the balance of human life and the
Blade Runners are police officers who specialise in locating and “retiring”
said subjects. Harrison Ford’s Rick Deckard is drafted back into the force to
hunt down a series of androids who have escaped from off-world colonies. His
investigation takes place in multiple locations around the city with some
rather monotone narrations from Ford layered across the runtime. It’s
incredibly slow and methodical, with only a few moments of action sprinkled
here and there; a deliberate decision. In terms of thematic resonance, Blade
Runner is in a league of its own; the entrance of replicants brings to light
several questions about human nature, how we change and often damage the
environment around us as well as our ability to create only producing more
problems. The future city has an air of intolerance to it, with people
bombarded with the dangling carrot of starting life anew on another planet;
there’s no doubt that society is on the ropes and this collection of themes
works to enhance the somewhat straightforward plot.
While Blade Runner offers an engaging set of themes, the main
characters don’t fare quite as well. Harrison Ford portrays Deckard with a solemn
mood to create the image of common man just trying to get by. But his
narrations just aren’t engaging and the film falls into the trap of telling the
audience, rather than showing them the mystery unravelling. Sean Young’s
Racheal, an attendant at the Tyrell Corporation, is also well defined in the
way she commits to her work but the character isn’t without problems; the bond
between Deckard and Rachel feels particularly weightless without much chemistry
between the two actors. On the other hand, many of the side characters and the
way they fit into the world bring a great amount of intrigue; the replicants,
led by Rutger Hauer’s phenomenal performance as Roy Batty are downtrodden,
seeking an understanding and meaning to their existence; when they can only
rely on each-other rather than the humans that created them, it creates a kind
of pathos for their struggles that blurs the line between protagonist and
antagonist. While the interactions could be better, the characters for the most
part do succeed at deepening the already rich themes of the narrative.
The slow pacing of Blade Runner will be a point of contention
for some; dropping the action to instead focus on building one of the most
immersive and engrossing worlds ever put to film. The dingy, low-lit cityscapes
of 2019 Los Angeles are absolutely stunning from the establishing shots with
miniatures right down to the real sets inhabited by the actors. The shots that
pan over the towering skyscrapers and the endless rainfall; it all epitomises
dystopia with the characters often feeling downcast, wearing very rough
clothing and getting their fix of food in tacky looking corner shops. The heavy
use of synths hangs over every shot, transplanting the film’s noir style
perfectly and there’s always something going on in the background to sell the
world. It’s simply the most detailed science fiction landscape ever put to
film; even with some inconsistencies in the theatrical cut, Blade Runner’s
intoxicating illusion of a future world never falters; it’s guaranteed to stun
anyone who watches it, even more than three decades later.
Having gained such a gargantuan cult following, Scott’s 1982
sci-fi flick is not without its flaws, which is mostly due to the main
performances. The original theatrical cut does magnify the film’s problems somewhat; with plot elements such as the dream sequence missing and some
aesthetical hiccups, the film feels incomplete. With that said, Blade Runner is
still a must-see film, a legend of the science fiction genre whose incredible
special effects and atmosphere have inspired countless contemporaries and
filmmakers.
Theatrical Cut Rating: 4/5 Stars (Great)
Final Cut Rating: 4.5/5 Stars (Brilliant)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.