Released: February 4th 2018 (Netflix)
Length: 102 Minutes
Certificate: 15
Director: Julius Onah
Starring: Gugu Mbatha-Raw, Daniel Bruhl, Daniel Oyelowo, Zhang Ziyi, Chris O'Dowd, Askel Hennie and Elizabeth Debicki
Since debuting a decade ago, the Cloverfield series has made
its name by slipping underground after each release, only to surprise
movie-goers with a new idea being pulled out of the mystery box. The third
entry in the franchise (which mostly ties things together with a few nuggets to
expand the mysteries) has taken a different turn, showing up on Netflix rather
than the big screen. Does it work? Not all that well I’m afraid.
The Cloverfield Paradox raises some eyebrows immediately
with its plot; set in the not-too-distant future aboard the Cloverfield Space
Station, the world’s energy resources are dwindling, with the major superpowers
set to go to war over the remaining supplies. It’s up to a multinational team
of astronauts, engineers and scientists to discover the secret to unlimited
energy and save the planet from catastrophe. The action unfolds both onboard
the space station and on Earth where a set of disasters with no clear cause
occur from the perspective of lone doctor Michael Hamilton (played by Roger
Davies) Paradox’s considerable distance from terra firma is only the start of
its failings. The film does a very poor job of world-building as we’re given
very basic glimpses of Earth and barely enough time to get to know the space
station and all its intricacies. Sure, the action takes you across many of the
station's rooms, but they never connect organically. The film's only real
strength narratively speaking is the way it haphazardly plays off your expectations
aboard the station with a series of random events, making for some occasionally unpredictable
surprises; but these are few and far between.
Not only is Paradox a poor contributor to the franchise’s
lore, it’s also very one note when it comes to originality. Of all the science
fiction films that have been released, it’s Danny Boyle’s Sunshine I was
reminded of the most while watching; a desperate mission in space to save those
back on Earth, a theme of impending doom and ultimate sacrifice hanging in the
balance. The Cloverfied Paradox feels rather derivative in this regard and on
top of that, there is barely any world-building both on and off planet Earth,
the former of which recalls 2008’s Cloverfield with none of the racing tension.
But more than anything else, Paradox doesn’t really feel like a part of the
franchise; previous films typically involved the entrance of the supernatural
and science fiction into a setting not dissimilar to our own. While this third
entry does have ties to issues such as dwindling energy supplies, putting it in
outer space seems rather far-fetched. Not only does the third entry step too
far outside the bounds of the series, but it also falls well short of the
acting standards set by the first two films.
There's only one real bright spot in The Cloverfield
Paradox's cast and that's Gugu Mbatha-Raw's performance as protagonist Ava
Hamilton; she conveys a lot of emotion throughout, particularly with the
distance between her and her husband on Earth. Unfortunately for those hoping
for performances up to the standards of the previous films, every other
performance throughout feels wasted; the other members of the cast are very
barebones; we learn next to nothing about them, particularly their lives on
Earth, which could have added more weight to their mission. Each of the
characters has one characteristic and little else. To name a few, Kiel is the
generic leader of the group with no real character arc, Tam's (Zhang Ziyi)
mandarin dialect seems tacked on to give the film some diversity and Elizabeth
Debicki's role, which I won't spoil for plot reasons, is painfully flat and
monotone. Of all of the characters though, it’s Irish engineer Mundy (Chris
O'Dowd) who draws the short straw here with a pretty awful scene involving his
arms that couldn’t stand out more awkwardly in a film that’s supposed to be
serious and intense. With so little chemistry between the crew, the attempts to
build the tension between fall woefully short.
At least it’s all competently produced; The Cloverfield
Paradox is no slouch in the visual department, with an array of detailed sets
and long exterior shots that translate the scale of the space station
beautifully. The music, while not all that memorable is effective sci-fi fare
as it transports you through time and space. The destruction that takes place
onboard is very well-rendered, as is the chaos on Earth with a collapsed
hospital looking especially bleak and war-torn. The aesthetics of the space
station itself fall somewhere in-between the analogue space trucker style of
Alien and the hyper future of Star Trek, with heavy uses of green and purple
highlighting the important bits of the machinery. Make-up effects for the more
brutal fatalities that occur feel especially nasty and overall the film does
deliver on the tinges of horror that made their way into Cloverfield and 10 Cloverfield Lane. The effects are strong despite a reduced budget, but they can
never coalesce properly because the film's other aspects are so prone to
failure, much like the station's own particle accelerator.
A far cry from its superior predecessors, The Cloverfield
Paradox has veered off course considerably, bringing us a rather rotten apple
from its mystery box formula. It does very little that other science fiction
films haven’t done already and what’s here is disappointingly underwhelming.
Despite its surprise release and minimal marketing, you’ll have a tough time
caring throughout.
Rating: 2/5 Stars (Disappointing)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.