Friday 28 February 2014

Downfall (Der Untergang) Movie Review

Throughout the history of cinema there have been numerous films based around the deadliest and most widespread human conflict in history; they focus on soldiers, civilians and the hundreds of stories in between. But one area seems to have gone unnoticed by the movie-making masses; a view of the conflict from the perspective of the Nazis. Downfall is here to break that mould and in doing so, presents a brilliant and emotive trip through the fall of a dictator.

Downfall (or Der Untergang in Germany) is focused on the fall of Adolf Hitler; in the closing days of World War Two the Russians are advancing into Berlin and the Fuhrer (played by Bruno Ganz), along with his most esteemed generals and closest allies in the Reichstag’s secret underground bunker are struggling to cope with countless losses and setbacks as a result of the advancing allied forces. Tensions gradually build within the Reich at the prospect of losing the war and impending doom and with this etched into their minds, the last Nazi officials realise that they must act to avoid capture or in other cases preserve the well-being of the German people in the midst of catastrophe. The story unfolds from a variety of perspectives, often flashing between different members of the Reich as they witness numerous events that unfolded in the Battle for Berlin. But the main narrative voice in Downfall is that of Traudl Junge (Alexandra Maria Lara), one of Hitler’s main secretaries who stays in the bunker, only to avoid the dangers of the outside world. From her viewpoint we see a much more emotional side of Hitler that no film has ever covered before; even though he was a truly despicable character (which is emphasised many times with his pride for murdering the Jews of Europe, scorched Earth policy and general disdain for his own people) he was still a human being who suffered and broke down as many of us sometimes do under loss and pressure. Downfall also deals with other themes in the war genre; the destruction of Berlin by the Russian Army gives way to many atrocities, making the audience feel sympathy for the people of Germany at that dark time, even the infamous Hitler’s Youth comes to a realisation that they put their trust in the wrong leader as they themselves are involved in the fighting. The greatest strength of Downfall’s plot is that it sets itself apart from practically every other war film out there; it concentrates heavily on the characters and their struggles, putting across a rather depressing tone from Hitler’s viewpoint, whilst also emphasising that the war had just as great an impact on the citizens of the Nazi Regime than it did on those directly involved.

There are many actors playing a role in Downfall, all of whom add to the film’s authenticity and all of whom deliver brilliant performances all around. At the centre is Bruno Ganz as Hitler, a fantastic performance which is perhaps the most realistic and compelling portrayal of the dictator yet seen in a film. Ganz spent four months studying to play the role to the best of his ability and it really shows; the dictator’s selfish nature and inability to lead a country is shown elegantly, whether he is insulting and blaming his generals for his losses or being too arrogant in believing that his operations will succeed without any difficulty. By the end of the film, you understand fully why Hitler fell, both as a leader and as a dictator. Hitler’s main generals, particularly his closest generals (played by the likes of Thomas Kretschmann, Heino Ferch and Ulrich Noethen) are also handled brilliantly; you can feel their nerves shredding when facing their leader with the news of another defeat with sweat in their hair and lumps in their throats. Then there are those who turn a blind eye to Hitler’s evil and will follow him to the end; Juliane Kohler as Hitler’s wife Eva Braun is almost completely ignorant of the losses that take place and often pretends that the danger doesn’t exist at all, highlighting her naive devotion to the Fuhrer. Similarly, Ulrich Matthes and Corinna Harfouch as Joseph and Magda Goebbells are just as evil as Hitler in that they outright refuse to believe that the Nazi regime will fall; these performances further emphasise just how ruthless and sadistic the Third Reich was. Finally there exists the characters that still possess their innocence in a place riddled with death and destruction; Alexandra Maria Lara puts in a great performance as Traudl Junge; she remains calm and professional to avoid provoking Hitler’s wrath while also avoiding the dangers of the besieged Berlin; in a sense, she represents the mind-set of the German people as a whole who were tricked into believing that Hitler would bring an era of peace and prosperity at the time. Likewise the young Peter Kranz (Donevan Gunia) along with his fellow peers believes that he is doing his country proud by serving in Hitler’s Youth, but in reality he is serving a monster and has clearly been desensitised by his experiences in direct combat. The way Downfall handles and juggles so many characters at once is simply astounding; every character has ample screen time and their arcs all come to an end in one way or another. It all adds up to an excellent cast that can rival that of big Hollywood blockbusters.

Downfall is not only one of the best World War Two films but also one of the best foreign films ever made. It’s one of the few films that can bring fresh perspective and humanity to a truly evil individual while also giving plenty of attention to those around him.


Rating: 5/5 Stars

Sunday 23 February 2014

Robocop (2014) Movie Review

Robocop, one of the most popular cult classics of the eighties; directed by Paul Verhoeven, the film carried his signature style but also proved to be quite thought provoking in its handling of themes. Now in 2014, after multiple delays the remake has finally arrived; though it has some entertaining moments, it ultimately pales in comparison to its predecessor.

The plot of Robocop 2014 is mostly the same as the original, but with a few differences. Detective Alex Murphy (Joel Kinnaman) is an officer who is severely injured in an improvised explosion from crime lord Antoine Vallon (Patrick Garrow). His body cannot be saved but his mind lives on in the cyborg law enforcer Robocop, built and designed by Chief Omnicorp Scientist Dennett Norton (Gary Oldman) and Robo sets out to clean the streets of Detroit whilst also dealing with the public’s perception of him and the corporation’s efforts to control him. The remake of Robocop is much more straightforward as a narrative; unfolding within a combination of action sequences with some slower paced moments in between. In terms of themes it’s all about corporate greed in the OCP’s efforts to get its unmanned weapons put out onto the streets of America. This does provide some links to the modern ethics of using drones and other machinery but nevertheless the plot barrels along at a very fast rate, not really requiring much thought and some scenes end up being completely pointless. The ending too is rather lacking, not really providing much closure. The plotline of Robocop ironically makes you wish at many points that the company had made a video game rather than a movie. The action scenes in particular would have made a strong impression if they were played rather than watched.

Where the acting talent in the original Robocop worked hard to give an element of duality in the roles, the remake seems to do everything by the book. None of the characters really serve much purpose throughout the film, nor do they go through any interesting arcs. Murphy starts off as a rather generic member of the force, as does his partner Jack Lewis (Michael K. Williams) who barely makes his presence known throughout the film. Kinnamann’s performance is often quite confusing; one minute he retains his thoughts as Murphy and the next he’s reduced to the mentality of a machine. This had potential to put across the difference between man and machine but it jumps back and forth with such reckless and irregular abandon that it really doesn’t matter much to the plot at the end of the day. Robocop’s wife and child (played by Abbie Cornish and John Paul respectively) play a larger role in the remake; again, this was an interesting choice but unfortunately they don’t deliver nearly enough chemistry and are never put in much danger to entice the audience into caring about them. The big name actors and other members of the cast placed on the poster go to waste throughout the film; Michael Keaton has nothing interesting to show as the head of the OCP, Gary Oldman comes close but never makes Professor Norton into a compelling character and as for Samuel L. Jackson, this could be his worst and most bare-bones role ever in a movie, only appearing in brief newsflashes scattered throughout the remake.

There was never any way around it; the 2014 remake of Robocop was going to be made using CGI; these effects work fairly well where the futuristic technology is concerned. The robots have more detail before and we are given more insight into Robo’s operating procedures with some slick point of view shots. The action sequences are framed fairly well although there does exist some moments where the camera shakes violently; the final fight where Robo takes on the ED-209s to reach the top of OCP headquarters is a solid improvement on the original film’s climax and the shootout in Vallon’s hideout features some effective lighting but on the whole the action sequences (which are arguably the best part of the film), like the rest of the film are far too brief to be very memorable. The futuristic environment is also lacking; the film claims to be set in 2028 and set outside of some fancy gadgets, the world of Detroit doesn’t look any different from our present day world; a wasted opportunity, given how modern movie technology can often render impressive and immersive settings.

If there’s one word to describe Robocop, it’s ‘’rushed’’. Despite being released more than twenty five years after the original, this remake constantly brushes over its good aspects while magnifying it’s bad ones. There are some parts that provide some mild enjoyment but this version of Robocop is unfortunately doomed in comparison with the original.


Rating: 2.5/5 Stars

Man of Steel Movie Review

It’s been seven long years since we last saw the world’s most famous superhero land on the silver screen with Superman Returns. The film rounded off the original saga nicely whilst keeping in spirit of the character. Now Man of Steel is taking a cue from The Dark Knight and reimagining the superhero in a more serious sense. It’s a recipe that’s sure to bode well for superhero movie fans but in execution, something is undeniably amiss about this retelling of the legendary Superman.


Man of Steel serves as an origins story for Superman, chronicling his beginnings on the planet Krypton and his first exploits on planet Earth. The film begins on the protagonist’s home planet where Jor-El (Russel Crowe) jettisons his son Kal-El into space, just moments before the planet is destroyed in a fiery explosion. In the ensuing carnage, General Zod (Michael Shannon) escapes and vows to hunt down Superman. Given how it was inspired by a similar trilogy of films by Christopher Nolan, Man of Steel takes some heavy liberties with the current trend of superhero movies; the story is told in both past and present, utilising flash backs that work with both success and detriment. On the one hand it’s good that audiences don’t have to sit through half a film about the protagonist’s origin story like they did with Batman Begins but on the flipside they also make the film very disjointed and as such interrupt the present day action time and time again. Other idiosyncrasies also pollute the plot; over the years we’ve been reminded many times that Superman is opposed to death and brutality but in Man of Steel he launches head-on into deadly combat, only caring about the people of Earth when the plot requires him to. Superman’s confrontation with Zod also seems to throw all logic out the window as the city of Metropolis is destroyed, but is then suddenly rebuilt in about five minutes, making the film’s conclusion completely nonsensical. It’s as if Snyder got so excited about filming the action sequences that he forgot to add in proper structure and sense to the story. Audiences will be able to follow the plot well enough, but the pile of niggling narrative flaws can be too distracting at times.

The casting of Man of Steel is hit-and-miss at best; Henry Cavill does a serviceable job as the titular character as he learns of his purpose and then rises to the lofty task of defeating Zod. Lois Lane (Amy Adams) is decent too; in an interesting twist she doesn’t start off instantly falling in love with Kal-El but it instead builds over the course of the film. Despite mostly being present in flash backs Kevin Costner makes the best impression in a highly emotive and sincere portrayal of Superman’s adoptive father, Jonathon Kent, just how you’d want him to be. But other than these actors, the rest are quite a let-down. Michael Shannon doesn’t bring much depth to the main antagonist, Zod; he’s just a loud and angry villain bent on destruction and nothing more. The other actors, including Russell Crowe and Laurence Fishburne as Editor Perry are either underplayed or don’t contribute much to make their presence felt, a huge disappointment, given the actor’s excellent reputations. The performances in general also reveal the biggest problem with Superman’s latest outing; there’s little to no emotion or drama going on. Long gone are the quiet and sombre moments when Superman would really reflect on his actions and his place in the universe, now he thunders from one action scene to the next for fear that the audience will get bored. Instead it falls upon the flash back sequences to deliver the heart, which they do but when everything else in the film is too serious for its own good, these moments don’t come nearly enough.

If there’s one thing ‘’Man of Steel’’ does undeniably well it’s the special effects. The set designs of Krypton look incredible, even for the short amount of screen time they take up and the final fight in Metropolis shows off some awesome destruction physics. In terms of spectacle, Man of Steel is unsurpassed; the scene where Superman first takes flight is amazing to watch and really does highlight how far we’ve come in the superhero genre. The music compositions by Hans Zimmer are just as epic as they were for Batman, perfectly complimenting the Man of Steel’s rise to being the guardian of Earth. Like the plot though, there also exists little things that really drag the film down to Earth. While it is refreshing to see Superman actually getting involved in battle (and the action is mostly well-shot!), the more straightforward and violent fight scenes in ‘’Man of Steel’’ really don’t work too well for the titular hero; all it amounts to is Superman putting in a few punches, getting knocked down or through a building and then attacking again, then rinse and repeat for the next fifteen minutes. In these sequences, both the effects and even Superman himself seem to forget about the innocent civilians caught up in the battles and there really isn’t much tension throughout, seeing as how the Man of Steel is practically invulnerable. The presentation of Superman’s latest adventure is dazzling to behold but it isn’t without its issues.

‘’Man of Steel’’ tries too hard to be super serious and in doing so forgets to balance out its tone with the emotion and heart that make the best superhero movies. It’s big on scale and spectacle but in the face of the new trend of superheroes the film is merely average.


Rating: 2.5/5 Stars

Wednesday 12 February 2014

Robocop (1987) Movie Review

Of all the science fiction films to be released in the 80s, Robocop stands as one of the most treasured and well remembered, in addition to being one of Paul Verhoeven’s best films. Now with the remake coming out this year, it’s fitting to look back at the original.

Robocop is set in the not-too-distant future in Detroit, where crime has all but consumed the city and the police forces, led by the OCP (Omni-Consumer Products) struggle to get a handle on the madness. From this setting we’re introduced to Alex Murphy (Peter Weller), a police officer who is sadistically executed by the ruthless Clarence Boddicker (Kurtwood Smith) in the line of duty. His remains are transformed into the cyborg law enforcer named Robocop who sets about cleaning up the streets and eventually unraveling the truth about OCP and who he once was. It’s a simple and straightforward plot but like many Verhoeven films it goes much further than that; the film explores (and satirizes) many themes including artificial intelligence, the relationship between media, law and society as well as human nature in relation to life, death and business. There’s a good mix of action and mild comedy but then you have scenes that are surprisingly heartfelt, such as when Robocop experiences flash backs to the life he once had. This scene along with the titular character’s ‘’prime directives’’ gives the film the feel of a superhero flick at times; Robocop even has his own theme song when he’s sent out on the beat. The plot also moves along at a solid rate, never stopping for too long and is always ready to throw another memorable scene at you. The only issue I had with the plot was that the climax wasn’t really a climax at all, just a routine shooting gallery that Robocop easily breezes through.

Robocop keeps it strong and simple when it comes to characterization. Peter Weller is capably versatile as both Alex Murphy and Robocop; in fact, the greatest strength of the cast is the way they bring a sense of duality most of the roles. Officer Anne Lewis (Nancy Allen) is Robocop’s closest ally, holding the most sympathy for him but she’s also a tough, no nonsense member of the force who is more than able to hold her own. Dick Jones (Ronny Cox); the senior president of the OCP is bent on cleaning up crime in Detroit but at the same time is willing to tread on anyone in his way to reach the top. Likewise Bob Morton (Miguel Ferrer) is more ethical when it comes to law enforcement but he also seeks to control Robocop at all times, seeing him as a product rather than a human being brought back from the dead. But by far the best of them all is Kurtwood Smith as Clarence Boddicker, one of the best human villains ever made; the man is filled with so much evil and cruelty that you’ll be cheering when he at last gets his due. Although there are some characters that are underplayed such as the disgruntled Sergeant Reed (Robert DoQui), the cast of Robocop nonetheless delivers where it counts with thoroughly well-rounded characters.

The practical effects used in Robocop are varied, interesting and often very well done. The suit designs by Rob Bottin are highly detailed showing off the punishment Robocop goes through while also putting across an imposing image for the law enforcer. The gore is often horrifically gruesome and over the top, fitting into the brutality of crime in Detroit while also staying true to Verhoeven’s style. Even the stop-motion effect on ED-209 works well because it distinguishes itself from all the modern films filled with CGI; this robot is real and was made to perform in front of the camera. The action scenes are frequently thrilling, thanks to some superb editing. The scene where Robocop breaks into a cocaine factory to take on an entire criminal cartel is filled with quick cuts between each of the gang members and more wide views to get a feel for the carnage going on. The futuristic setting portrayed is also very interesting in the way it creatively fiddles with the idea American consumerism and the decaying of the old in the transition to new ideals. The presentation of Robocop, like many other aspects of the film proves that it can still stand up today.

RoboCop was one of the best movies of the eighties but it really shouldn’t be confined to that time period; it continues to be cherished as a science fiction cult classic and having inspired many other works of fiction of film and video games it’s as timeless as ever.

Rating: 4/5 Stars

Thursday 6 February 2014

The Wolf of Wall Street Movie Review

Martin Scorsese is a master of the crime drama; time and time again he has woven detailed and thoroughly engaging criminal tales over the years that define standards in movie-making. He returns once again with ‘’The Wolf of Wall Street’’; arguably his most light-hearted (yet still crazily entertaining) film to date.

Based on the memoir of the same name; ‘’The Wolf of Wall Street’’ follows the life and times of Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio) a stockbroker on Wall Street who with his company Stratton Oakmont cheated both the economic system and his own clients to become rich and corrupt with wealth beyond his wildest dreams. All the while, Belfort must attend to the needs of family, friends, and a prying FBI agent named Patrick Denham out to bust him (Kyle Chandler). The film takes place across many countries and several decades that chronicle Belfort’s rise and eventual fall in a similar way to Brian De Palma’s ‘’Scarface’’. Where Belfort’s memoir contained a serious account of his brushes with the law, Scorsese’s vision focuses on the opposite. ‘’The Wolf of Wall Street’’ is insanely over-the-top in every conceivable way; whether it’s the endless shouting, swearing, drug use and sex scenes or how Belfort’s company is quite literally degenerated into a pack of rabid wolves, the film is a testament to how having all this money can corrupt beyond belief. The only problem with all this madness is that it can become very exhausting; a good half of the film is spent watching Belfort and company going completely crazy at parties and in the office. A more serious tone does arrive later but for those who appreciate a more controlled and focused crime drama experience, ‘’The Wolf of Wall Street’’ will be rather jarring at first. Another niggling flaw is the theme of economics that persists through the film; unless you’re a stout follower of the topic, most of the financial tones will go right over your head.

There may be a large cast present but in truth ‘’The Wolf of Wall Street’’ is all about Jordan Belfort and Leonardo DiCaprio once again delivers a stellar performance all around. Belfort is a truly unforgettable character; his narrations of the plot draw you in and even though he spends most of the movie yelling through a microphone there’s also moments where he can show some emotion; the scene where he goes ballistic at the prospect of divorce is particularly strong. Though they never hold the spotlight for too long, the side characters are also solid, especially Jonah Hill who completely nails the drug-addled Donnie Azoff, Belfort’s right hand man. The other members of Stratton Oakmont stick to the basics; Jon Bernthal as a company courier, Jon Favreau as a security supervisor, and Rob Reiner as Belfort’s father among others round off the cast and they play off the main leads well enough, making their presence known whilst never distracting from DiCaprio and Hill. These performances comes at a contrast with Kyle Chandler who is much more stable but often ruthless in his pursuit of Belfort and his cohorts. The writing as with many Scorsese films is sharp, witty and in this case possessed with a great sense of humour; in keeping with the film’s over-the-top vibe the banter between characters and drug-infused shenanigans will often bring a chuckle from many a viewer. But the conversations also work to the film’s detriment; there is a great deal of talking and arguing in the movie and sometimes the voices of the characters can drone on for a bit too long, unnecessarily lengthening the film when the next major plot-line could be brought in.

‘’The Wolf of Wall Street’’ may not be Scorsese’s best film but with a brilliant performance from DiCaprio and an all-around crazy vibe, it’s another entertaining and downright hilarious movie primed to entertain.


Rating: 4/5 Stars

Wednesday 5 February 2014

Quick Update: February 2014

Hello to all!

It's been a little while since I last posted so I thought a mini-update on things is in order.

What's been going on at Bournemouth Uni? A ton! Things are really pilling on for the second semester; out goes online and Media, Journalism and Society and in comes radio and TV journalism. Speaking of radio; ''GamePower'' is now live! Every two weeks on Saturday from 8 till 9pm John Cottrel and myself will be reviewing the newest computer games and commenting on recent gaming news. We've ran two episodes so far and even though it's still in the growing stages right now it should be able to go on for a fairly long time to come. You can follow the show at these pages...

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/GamePower/352147411589834
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GamePowerBU

On top of GamePower and starting the second semester there's also several websites which I've began writing for; CompareMyMobile, StudentCom and TheStudentEye. Below are links to the work I've been doing for each company.

CompareMyMobile: This is a technology website which focuses mainly on mobiles whether it's trading, queries or mobile gaming. 

  • Top 5 Mobile Games to avoid at all costs: http://blog.comparemymobile.com/top-5-mobile-games-to-avoid-at-all-costs/
  • Top 10 Classic Games you can play on your phone (will be uploaded soon)
StudentCom: This is an internet provider for universities which also doubles as an online student website. I am just one of many students who contributes to this website.
  • 5 Reasons to avoid fanboyism in gaming: http://www.studentcom.co.uk/news/entertainment/gaming/5-reasons-to-avoid-fanboyism-in-gaming.html#.UvJZwfl_uSo
  • Ethics of the internet: The Trouble with Trolling (Will be uploaded soon)
TheStudentEye: This is a division of the Bournemouth Echo newspaper dedicated to showcasing work by Multimedia Journalism on their website. You can follow them on Twitter here https://twitter.com/TheStudentEye
  • Ethics of the internet: The Trouble with trolling: http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/features/student_eye/features/10981548.Ethics_of_the_internet__The_trouble_with_trolling/
And that's about it; review of ''The Wolf of Wall Street'' is incoming (watching it tonight!) but otherwise things at BU carry on as usual. Watch this space!